半泽直树

上半年机器人产业规上企业营收达1655亿元 我国将打造一批智能机器人标志性产品_我的网站

A |       8月19日，主题为“人机共生 产需共融”的2026世界机器人大会在北京开幕。    

    Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle Photo: Courtesy of China's Supreme People's Court Guangzhou Maritime Court recently successfully mediated a 180 million yuan ($25 million) dispute arising from a collision between two oil tankers in waters near the Strait of Hormuz, with both parties agreeing to apply Chinese law and submit their dispute to the Chinese court, the Global Times learned from the court on Sunday.
In 2025, two crude oil tankers collided at the eastern entrance to the Strait of Hormuz, 24 nautical miles off Fujairah, United Arab Emirates, media reported.
Owned by oil tanker operator Frontline, the Liberia-flagged vessel Front Eagle collided with the Antigua and Barbuda-flagged vessel Adalynn on the morning of June 17, 2025.
The Adalynn was damaged in the fire. While the Front Eagle was undergoing repairs in Shenzhen, South China's Guangdong Province, Global Shipping Holding Ltd., which owns the Adalynn, applied to Guangzhou Maritime Court for its arrest. Frontline provided a cash security of 203 million yuan to release the arrest and applied to establish a limitation fund for maritime claims.
The court approved the application and allowed Frontline to establish the limitation fund, setting the amount of the fund at 168 million yuan.
Guangzhou Maritime Court held four pretrial conferences on October 11, 2025, January 12, May 6 and July 13, 2026 to complete preparations for evidence examination, technical investigations and reported the relevant pretrial arrangements to the provincial high court, the Global Times learned from the court. 
The court held a public hearing for the case on July 14, 2026.
No government agency had conducted an investigation into the collision, and no official findings were issued after the accident. Taking into account the unique burden-of-proof challenges in maritime collision disputes, Guangzhou Maritime Court took measures to preserve key evidence when handling the vessel arrest, including navigation logs, AIS data, voyage data recorder (VDR) records and CCTV footage, the court told the Global Times in a statement on Sunday.
Under a process that involves exchanging evidence inventories, sealing materials simultaneously and jointly reviewing them after evidence submissions, the court helped ensure the authenticity of critical records and laid the groundwork for determining the facts of the case.
As the two sides and their respective maritime experts reached sharply different conclusions over liability, the court introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism, with the consent of both parties, allowing technical experts to participate throughout the proceedings. Drawing on the preserved evidence, investigators reconstructed the collision, assessed the vessels' encounter situation and clarified the parties' respective responsibilities.
Following the hearing, the court facilitated mediation, and the two parties reached a settlement agreement on July 27, 2026. On July 31, the court organized the distribution of the maritime liability limitation fund among creditors involved in the foreign vessel collision dispute and related charter-party disputes. 
Representatives of the Adalynn traveled from overseas to the court to present a letter of appreciation and a commemorative banner in recognition of the court's efforts, according to the court statement. 
After the Guangzhou Maritime Court accepted the case, both parties agreed to apply Chinese law to establish a maritime liability limitation fund and resolve their substantive dispute, breaking away from the long-standing reliance of international shipping disputes on European and US courts and legal systems.
Choice of justice 
Bilov Viacheslav, a representative of Global Shipping Holding Ltd., told the Global Times that the main reason they chose a Chinese court to mediate the case is that "we want absolutely fair, unbiased approach to this issue. Because nowadays in this world, there are some countries which believe that they are authorized to give instruction to all others, which definitely is having influence on the decisions of the judge on the approach to the case."
Viacheslav gave the Chinese court's handling of the case a five-star rating, saying he had expected the dispute to take at least three years to resolve, but the Chinese court settled it within just one year. He also praised the judges and lawyers for their commitment to advancing the case throughout the proceedings.
"The judges and lawyers worked to advance the case with the same level of commitment as I did, even though the case directly concerned my own interests. This left a deep impression on me about litigation in China," Viacheslav said.
The case involved two foreign parties and a collision that occurred near the Strait of Hormuz, with no direct connection to China or Guangzhou Maritime Court initially. The fact that the parties chose to seek vessel arrest in China and agreed to apply Chinese law demonstrates the credibility and appeal of China's maritime judicial system, Wu Guining, vice president of the Guangzhou Maritime Court, who served as the presiding judge of the case, told the Global Times. 
The court also introduced a maritime technical investigator mechanism in the case, an innovation aimed at addressing complex technical issues arising from vessel collision accidents, Wu said, noting that through technical investigations, the court was able to establish the facts of the case more efficiently, highlighting the integration of professional maritime investigation capabilities with China's specialized maritime adjudication system.
The case demonstrates China's ability to handle major, complex and cross-border maritime disputes with professional expertise, Wu said.
The handling of the collision between the two vessels is just one example of how Chinese courts have been dealing with a growing number of foreign-related maritime cases in recent years.
The Global Times learned from China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) in October last year that over the past 40 years, Chinese courts have handled a total of 88,000 foreign-related maritime cases involving parties from 146 countries and regions.
At a lecture held by the SPC on Friday, Shen Hongyu, director of the Fourth Civil Division of the SPC, told the Global Times that in recent years, Chinese courts have become more influential in participating in and promoting global ocean governance reform. Maritime justice serves as an important instrument for practicing the vision of a maritime community with a shared future and for advancing the reform of the global ocean governance system. 
。大会由中国电子学会、世界机器人合作组织共同主办。记者 任超 摄  8月19日，2026世界机器人大会在京开幕。《经济参考报》记者从大会获悉，2025年机器人产业规模以上企业营业收入突破3000亿元，近5年年均增速超20%；今年上半年达到1655亿元，同比增长24.5%。下一步，工业和信息化部将以智能化为主线，推动机器人产业创新发展。聚焦核心零部件、具身智能等关键环节，打通产学研用创新链条，鼓励中外科研机构、企业开展联合攻关，打造一批先进、实用、易用的智能机器人标志性产品。  当前，全球人工智能技术创新空前活跃，智能机器人作为人工智能从数字世界走向物理世界的重要载体，正以前所未有的速度赋能千行百业、走进千家万户。  中国科协副主席、书记处第一书记贺军科表示，智能机器人作为先进制造技术和认知科学、计算科学、神经科学等前沿科技的集大成者，拓展了人工智能技术的应用场景，也赋予机器人技术巨大发展空间。  据悉，本届大会有参展企业300余家。透过大会可以看到，无论是工业、商业，还是家庭消费场景，不少企业更加重视机器人在真实场景下的商用交付，聚焦“智能化”关键词，机器人对物理世界的感知能力进一步增强。

B |   优必选相关负责人表示，2026年人形机器人行业告别概念化探索，迈入场景化、实用化、规模化发展新阶段。企业构建起“基座模型-世界模型-行动模型”的全栈式自研技术体系，其中在机器人基座模型上重点突破两大核心能力，一是机器人第一视角下的场景认知与任务规划能力，二是支撑物理交互的精准感知与空间理解能力。  “推理效率是具身智能从实验室走向真实场景的关键瓶颈。”大晓机器人世界模型负责人王飞表示，当今的大模型已经学会了理解语言，未来的世界模型会进一步学会理解现实。世界模型不是视频生成技术的简单延伸，它本质上是在构建机器对于世界运转规律的认知能力。随着世界模型、强化学习和机器人技术进一步融合，具身智能才有机会真正走向真实世界。  天眼查数据显示，截至目前，我国现有机器人产业链相关企业超116.5万家，今年以来新增约14.4万家。从新成立企业类型看，科学研究和技术服务业新增约5.4万家，信息传输、软件和信息技术服务业新增约2.29万家，制造业新增约1.72万家。

C | 这表明机器人产业的新增主体不再只是整机生产企业，而是更多围绕算法研发、系统集成、场景解决方案、软件平台和工程服务展开，机器人与AI、软件、自动化系统的融合趋势更加明显。  不过也要看到，智能机器人产业发展仍然面临不少挑战，智能化水平不高、技能作业能力不强等问题仍较突出。工业和信息化部副部长辛国斌表示，将以智能化为主线，以实用化为牵引，统筹技术攻关、产业培育、场景拓展与安全治理，推动机器人产业创新发展。  辛国斌表示，将强化创新合作，共同推动机器人产业智能化升级；同时深化应用联动，共同推动产业化进程，聚焦农业、医疗、养老、应急等应用空间广，示范效应强的重点行业，分类组织开展产用结对攻关，实地应用验证和成熟场景推广，以新场景大规模应用，加速新技术新产品迭代升级。  中国电子学会理事长徐晓兰表示，具身智能产品正处在从“小批量试用”转向“大规模落地”的关键节点，未来需围绕核心零部件、软件算法、数据资源、整机制造和应用方案全链条，联合开展技术攻关，共建具身智能联合研发中心，积极开展大科学工程合作，聚焦柔性触觉传感器、精细操作灵巧手、世界模型等前沿技术，推进协同创新突破。（记者 郭倩）。

Current article:http://www.qiniaohongfangfoguisenzhai.cyou/sfdcqj/pt5.xlsx

Published on:07:37:39