时事辩论会

从投资热土到产业高地——天津经开区围绕产业链“筑基、强链、育新”,从投资热土到产业高地——天津经开区围绕产业链“筑基、强链、育新”_我的网站

A |     The UN General Assembly in New York is meeting Tuesday to discuss ways to make the Security Council more representative and equitable.,The meeting, convened by General Assembly President Abdulla Shahid in a letter dated July 7, is tasked with deliberating the “question of equitable representation and an increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council.” Sahid is expected to present a draft oral decision “following consultations” with General Assembly members.,A draft presented on the UN’s website reaffirms “the central role of the General Assembly concerning the question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council,” and expresses “the commitment of heads of state and government representing the peoples of the world to instill new life in the discussions on the reform of the Security Council.”,The draft proposes the continuation of “intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform” at the upcoming 77th General Assembly in September, including the creation of an “open-ended working group” to discuss the matter.,Background,Created as part of the United Nations after the end of the Second World War, the Security Council consists of the world’s five major nuclear powers (Russia, China, the United States, France, and Britain) and 10 rotating non-permanent members. Collectively, their main goal is the maintenance of international peace and security.,A key difference between the UN and its Security Council and the League of Nations – the defunct intergovernmental organization formed in the aftermath of the First World War, is the inclusion in the former of the right for each permanent member to veto substantive resolutions made by other members, such as accepting new members into the UN, or authorizing the use of force against another country.,The veto concept was a hard-fought victory of the Soviet delegation at the San Francisco conference on the UN’s formation. Moscow argued for the right of veto to prevent one or more major powers from ganging up on others to pursue national geopolitical, economic, or military interests at the expense of others using the UN platform to provide such actions with legitimacy.,The veto principle enabled the Security Council and the UN generally to the survive multiple international crises, both during the Cold War and in the three decades after 1991, and ensured that the UN did not collapse, as its League of Nations predecessor did, in times of crisis.,Putin on 75th Anniversary of WWII: Shared Responsibility to History and Future18 June 2020, 19:47 GMT,Why Reform Now?,The Security Council underwent two major reforms: in 1965, when the original non-permanent membership was increased from six to ten to account for the emergence of new countries in the Global South after the collapse of European colonial empires, and in 1971, when the US dropped its veto to allow the People’s Republic of China to take up its rightful seat at the Security Council, replacing Taiwan.,Discussions on reforming the Security Council began anew in the early 1990s, as the United States and its allies, convinced of their triumph and status as leaders of a new global order following the collapse of the USSR, began discussing the "end of history" and conceptualizing ways to make the 21st century an “American century.” On the other side of the debate, rising powers from the Third World began pushing to reform the UN to make it more representative of their interests.,In 2005, rising economic giants India and Brazil, as well as Germany and Japan, the defeated Axis powers, formed the so-called G4 group of nations to support one another’s push for permanent Security Council membership. In 2005, then-UN Secretary General Kofi Annan put forward a proposal to expand the council to 24 members, either by creating six new permanent members and three new non-permanent ones, or eight new non-permanent members of a new class of rotating members and one additional non-permanent seat. In 2017, the G4 announced their readiness to temporarily accept non-veto wielding status to become permanent Security Council members.,Opponents of reforming the Security Council have made arguments on the basis of perceived balance of power-related concerns, such as Pakistan opposing India’s permanent membership, or Spain and Italy opposing German membership, South Korea opposing Japanese membership, and major Latin American powers like Argentina, Mexico, and Colombia opposing Brazil’s membership. Other rising powers, such as Turkey, have argued in favor of the Security Council’s expansion to better represent Asian, Latin American, and African countries.,Moscow has paid a heavy price for its permanent membership in the Security Council, first through its central role in defeating Nazi Germany and Japan during the Second World War, and then in 1991, by taking upon itself the entirety of the USSR’s $66 billion perestroika-era debt after the country’s collapse. But Russia has also expressed support for reforming the body to better represent developing nations, particularly India and Brazil, as well as a candidate from Africa. At BRICS summits in 2021 and 2022, Russia and China reiterated their continued support for improving the BRICS’ status at the UN, including via a comprehensive reform of the Security Council.,Iran Asks to Join BRICS27 June, 17:19 GMT,In recent months, these calls have grown louder, with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov indicating in April that countries from the Global South would be an excellent way to curb the “unilateralism” of the West at the UN.,Last week, Russian Ambassador to China Andrei Denisov reaffirmed Russia’s readiness to discuss the expansion of the Security Council to provide membership to India and Brazil, but not US allies Germany and Japan.,“Russia is calling for the expansion of the UN Security Council based on a broad consensus. It requires increasing the proportionate share of African, Asian and Latin American countries for the UN Security Council to be able to reflect the aspirations of people around the world and be a more democratic body,” Denisov said, speaking at the World Peace Forum in Beijing on July 4.,“At the same time, I would like to be frank – we aren’t ready to support the accession of actors such as Germany and Japan. We don’t see any added value from their potential accession. Given the current balance on the Council – or imbalance, I should say, the membership of the two aforementioned candidates is unlikely to strengthen it, rather it will make the imbalance even more striking,” the diplomat stressed.,An Idea Whose Time Has Come?,“It appears that all nations are aware that the UNSC must become more inclusive and representative of the reality of today’s world,” says Paolo Raffone, director of the CIPI Foundation, a Brussels-based think tank.,According to the observer, apart from the 1971 modification of the Council to reflect China taking over Taiwan’s seat, the UNSC of today still largely “reflects the world of 1945.”,“For many years the UNSC has been blocked by cross-veto proceedings, affecting stability and peace in the world. Unblocking the UNSC is the most urgent need for all nations wishing for the effectiveness of a rule-based international systems,” Raffone argues.,Raffone favors adding BRICS countries into the mix, pointing to their collective status representing “the largest share of world population, land and [purchasing power parity],” as well as “spectacular” economic growth over the past two decades. “Their inclusion in the UNSC would certainly strive to keep globalization alive under new rules and governance,” and reduce problems such as lack of democracy, poor geographical representation, and “lack of legitimacy for ensuring global governance” of the current body, he believes.,The observer emphasizes, however, that for any reform initiative to succeed, two-thirds of the UN’s member states would have vote for and ratify it, with every permanent member of the Security Council also needing to agree – no easy task to pull off.,EXCLUSIVE: New Delhi Does Not Support Attempts to Isolate Russia, Says Russian Ambassador to India5 July, 10:29 GMT,New Multipolar World Order,“The enlargement of the UN Security Council would formally certify, on the international level, the transition from US unipolarism to the new multipolar architecture. It would be an epochal event!” says Tiberio Graziani, chairman of Vision & Global Trends: International Institute for Global Analyses, an Italy-based international affairs think tank.,Graziani is convinced that the benefits from the body’s expansion would be multifold, including rebalancing power in international organizations “hitherto essentially ‘Westernist’” and “hegemonized” by the West. “Above all,” he says, “enlargement would be essential to ensure greater stability” in the “turbulent geopolitical and geo-economic transition” that the present moment represents.,The observer stresses that any reforms would need to be gradual to prevent an institutional crisis, but admits that “some reforms must be radical,” given the organization’s dominance by Western powers.,Like Raffone, Graziani supports the increased visibility of BRICS nations in the body, citing their outsized significance to global security and the economy and underrepresentation in this sense.,“At the moment we are in a particular situation: on the one hand there is the West led by the United States and the British which constitutes a conservative pole that aims to maintain a hegemonic role on a planetary level, on the other hand there is a set of nations (basically the BRICS countries) which demand a greater presence in global decisions. Within the framework of the UN, the contribution of the BRICS countries would be fundamental since it would guarantee a balance that has not been there so far,” Graziani believes.,The observer stresses that there simply is no alternative to the UN’s authority in international affairs, and that subsequently, “a new, more balanced (multipolar) international forum needs to be set up” in the present situation.。    　　卫星总装车间内，天津辰星技术股份有限公司旗下阿童木品牌研制的多自由度刚性具身智能机械臂，通过了最后一轮出厂测试，即将搭乘云遥宇航设计的商业卫星启程。不久后，这款机器人将实现太空作业。8月6日，在天津辰星技术股份有限公司，工作人员测试一台工业并联机器人。组图均由新华社记者 赵子硕 摄　　辰星机器人所在的天津经济技术开发区(以下简称“天津经开区”)，是我国首批国家级经开区之一。从1984年在盐碱荒滩上起步，到如今成为外资云集、新质生产力涌动的产业高地，一场围绕产业链筑基、强链、育新的深刻变革正在这里发生。　　国家管网集团天津综合试验基地等项目顺利开工，生物医药等新兴产业集群起势，外资企业加码创新深耕中国……天津经开区立足传统优势产业夯实发展底盘，聚焦前沿新兴赛道壮大增量动能，一批战略性重大项目及内外资创新项目加速落地。今年上半年，工业战略性新兴产业增加值占比达40.4%。　　“我们紧扣‘新质、优质、高质’，着力推动主导产业转型升级，蓄力培育壮大新兴产业和未来产业，鼓励支持企业扎根发展、增资扩产，持续塑造高质量发展新动能。”天津经济技术开发区党委书记、管委会主任洪世聪说。　　优势产业更具科技感　　经过深度提纯后的氙气，是一种重要的电子级特种气体，可广泛应用于集成电路、航空航天、医疗装备等产业。但由于工艺难度较大，堪称“沙里淘金”。　　如何高精度提炼氙气，曾是制约行业发展的一大技术难题。

B | “我们能做到提取‘5个9’纯度的高纯氙气，通过精制工序深度提纯，纯度达99.999%。

C | ”天津旺海科技发展有限公司总经理冯国辉自豪地告诉记者。　　公司厂区的中控室内，大屏幕上实时跳动着氙气、氦气提纯装置的各项参数。企业已建成氪氙粗精制、氦氖精制、自动化充装等完整产线，年产充装能力达10万瓶，可生产高纯氦、氙、氖、氪等电子级稀有气体。

D | 　　“在天津经开区管委会帮助下，我们新建了氦气纯化液化技改项目，填补京津冀地区规模化液氦量产的空白。

E | ”冯国辉说，这一项目投产后将有效提升区域高端稀有气体的自主保障能力。　　从空气里“筛”出高端稀有气体，是天津经开区传统化工产业向高附加值赛道升级的生动缩影。不远处，另一家企业将目光投向“液体”，从另一条路径验证着精细化工的广阔前景。　　天津市长芦化工新材料有限公司的展厅里，一台服务器整机浸没在澄澈的全氟聚醚液体中，指示灯在液面下清晰闪烁，科技感十足。

F | 　　“AI算力设备的功耗持续提升，浸没式液冷是新的技术方向，全氟聚醚流体正是液冷应用的核心介质。

G | ”天津长芦化工新材料有限公司党支部书记、董事长杨继林介绍，公司自主研发的氢氟醚、全氟聚醚两大系列产品无毒、绝缘、无腐蚀性，是绿色环保型清洗剂和冷却液的理想原料，广泛用于芯片清洗、算力设备散热等领域。　　今年7月，工信部公布了精细化工关键产品创新任务揭榜挂帅入围揭榜单位名单，长芦化工入围“氟醚润滑油”产品名单。此外，相关产品还顺利通过国际头部企业的验证。　　石化产业是天津经开区主导优势产业之一，产业集群规模已突破千亿元。作为主要承载地的南港工业区，一条条管廊纵横交错，一座座银塔罐区连片成群，气势恢宏。近年来，南港工业区绿色石化产业持续提质升级，已覆盖传统精细化工11大类中8大类，累计落地65个优质项目，总投资达653.75亿元。　　“我们的打法是‘聚链成群’，系统推动精细化工高质量发展，形成高端材料产业集群和细分门类齐全的精细化工项目矩阵。”洪世聪说，将持续推动这一优势产业向未来赛道跃升，激活产业发展新动能。这是5月23日拍摄的天津经济技术开发区“于响”片区一景。

H | 　　解锁发展新空间　　立足传统优势产业链，如何解锁产业发展新空间？长期深耕磁悬浮技术的天津飞旋科技股份有限公司也有自己的答案。

I | 　　前不久，由飞旋科技承担的“高速高负载磁悬浮轴承关键技术”项目取得阶段性成果，“1.6MW(兆瓦)高效高负载磁悬浮轴承”样机完成组装，核心技术指标达到国际领先水平。　　“在工业领域，磁悬浮轴承被誉为提升工业能效的‘核心利器’，具有‘无接触、零摩擦、免润滑’的技术优势。”天津飞旋科技股份有限公司董事长洪申平介绍，2024年，飞旋科技联合清华大学、武汉大学等7所高校组建产学研攻关团队，经过近一年半的攻关，完成样机的组装测试。　　未来，这一技术将主要应用于空压机、制冷压缩机等流体机械，从容应对毫秒级电压波动，为AI算力设施提供可靠的制冷方案。　　天津大学机械工程学院教授谢辉认为，天津经开区的传统产业转型没有另起炉灶，而是沿着产业链向价值链高端攀升，以技术创新打通新旧产业的衔接通道，为区域制造业高质量发展注入持久动力。　　而在生物医药等领域，天津经开区瞄准赛道，不断发力。“相关产业基地在天津经开区拔节生长，配套企业已超40家，这些企业各有看家本领，引领着行业细分赛道，还能实现就近协同。

J | ”天津经开区医药健康局相关负责人说，随着凯莱英、法尔玛等项目的实施，完备的产业配套也为更多企业落户发展提供了广阔空间。

K | 　　“如果说新兴产业是当下的增长引擎，那么未来产业则是面向明天的战略储备。”洪世聪说，天津经开区已获批天津市首批未来产业先导区，在具身智能、脑机接口、量子科技等前沿赛道加速布局。

L | 今年上半年，一批未来产业的标志性项目在经开区落地生根。　　天津经开区实施《天津经开区未来产业培育发展行动计划》，聚焦“优势产业未来化”和“未来技术产业化”，深耕生物制造、通用人工智能等领域，搭建未来产业体系。“我们以先导区建设为牵引，推动脑机接口、量子科技等前沿领域从‘技术破冰’走向‘产业成林’，为区域高质量发展赢得先机。”洪世聪说。

M | 　　深耕本土谋新机　　经济学中，如果把产业链看成一条“微笑曲线”，附加值更多体现在两端，即研发设计和销售。全球价值链分工中，大部分利润集中在研发与服务两端。　　天津经开区正在吸引越来越多的外企全球研发总部加速向中国布局。透视外资在华布局的迁移轨迹，恰恰沿着这条“微笑”曲线向两端延伸。　　机械臂挥舞，AGV自动导引车穿梭——走进位于滨海新区的奥的斯泰达基地，生产现场十分忙碌。这条自动化率达75%的生产线上，近20个工序均实现自动化作业。　　“这是我们刚建成的智能化控制柜生产线，针对的就是老旧小区电梯更新、既有建筑焕新的市场需求。

N | ”在生产车间，奥的斯泰达基地制造总监闫铭铭指着一排移动的工装小车介绍，每辆小车根据接收到的信息，能生产不同型号的控制柜，实现柔性生产。　　“中国市场是奥的斯全球布局的关键，我们将不断加码研发投入，与中国同频共振。”奥的斯中国区总裁罗小莉说，依托2023年落户天津经开区的北方研发中心，奥的斯发布了面向适老化需求的智能电梯及人机协同巡检具身智能体等创新成果。今年上半年，企业老旧小区电梯更新等现代化更新业务订单同比增长50%。　　在生物医药领域，世界500强丹纳赫旗下飞诺美中国研发中心加码布局主攻核酸医药相关色谱柱及填料研发，可为区内凯莱英等企业提供配套支持。　　如今，包括奥的斯北方研发中心、PPG全球涂料创新研究院在内的38家外资研发中心落户经开区。

o | 外资企业正在用行动表明，深度融入本土创新生态正成为在华布局的新逻辑。　　外资企业与中国市场保持同频共振，也体现在一个个不断加码投资的新项目中。今年上半年，跨国龙头持续增资扩产，诺和诺德追加投资2亿元提升组装生产能力，SEW投资20亿元建设第五工厂，三星电机投资20亿元建设AI服务器专用MLCC新产线，一汽-大众实现燃油车与插电混动车型柔性共线生产……工作人员在天津经济技术开发区一汽-大众华北基地总装车间装配车辆。　　“这些项目都是动辄几十亿级别的真金白银投入，充分说明外资企业对中国市场的信心坚定不移。

p | ”洪世聪说，我们以制度创新与精准服务，为更多外资企业从投资兴业到深度共生铺就坚实跑道。　　从“空气淘金”的技术跃迁，到“合成生物造药”的产业落地，再到外资企业“扎根共生”的主动布局，天津经开区的发展图谱，正是中国经济高质量发展、开辟增长新空间的生动缩影。　　记者：邵香云 杨文 赵子硕　　来源：新华每日电讯。

Current article:http://www.qiniaohongfangfoguisenzhai.cyou/list_0of/vh26avc.htm

Published on:18:12:31