回家的诱惑

EU can't reach decision on prolonging the use of chemical herbicide glyphosate_我的网站

A |     聚焦游戏分享          共享教研智慧          # 自主游戏观察与评价 #          水映加州幼儿园                              在对自主游戏活动的探索与实践中，水映加州幼儿园聚焦自主游戏中的“游戏分享”，持续优化游戏分享内容的组织与实施，关注游戏分享交流，通过理论学习、现场观摩、互动研讨等形式，共同学习、研思，推进教师的专业成长的同时也助力幼儿发展          +自主游戏观察与评价+          ♫♩♪♫♩♪♫♩♪♫                              – 01 –          表达观点，明确方向                              教研前期，马老师结合教师们对游戏分享的价值观点，借助信息技术梳理了关于“游戏分享”的关键词。    BRUSSELS -- A European Union decision on whether to authorize the use of the controversial chemical herbicide glyphosate in the 27-nation bloc for at least 10 more years was delayed for a month after member countries failed to agree on Friday.The chemical, which is widely used in the 27-nation bloc, is approved on the EU market until mid-December. Representatives of the EU’s executive arm and member countries voted Friday in favor of renewing its authorization until 2033, despite protests from environmental groups. But to be adopted, the 10-year extension proposed by the European Commission required a “qualified majority,” defined as 55% of the 27 members representing at least 65% of the total EU population of some 450 million people. Several member states abstained, and that was not achieved. The European Commission is now expected to amend its proposal before another vote takes place next month. Ultimately, if no consensus is found, the Commission will have the final say.Green members of the European Parliament welcomed the delay and urged member states to vote for a complete ban of glyphosate.“It is irresponsible to again renew the authorization of the use of glyphosate,” said Bas Eickhout, the vice-chair of the Parliament's environment committee. "This would give the big agri a blank check to earn billions by selling a pesticide for which there are still big gaps in knowledge about the effects on our health, and at the same time poses large risks for European biodiversity.”Over the past decade, glyphosate, used in products like the weedkiller Roundup, has been at the heart of heated scientific debate about whether it causes cancer and its possible disruptive effect on the environment. The chemical was introduced by Monsanto in 1974 as an effective way of killing weeds while leaving crops and plants intact.The France-based International Agency for Research on Cancer, which is part of the World Health Organization, classified it as a “probable human carcinogen” in 2015. The EU’s food safety agency had paved the way for the 10-year extension when it said in July it “did not identify critical areas of concern” in the use of glyphosate. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found in 2020 that the herbicide did not pose a health risk to people, but a federal appeals court in California ordered the agency last year to reexamine that ruling, saying it wasn’t supported by enough evidence.EU member states are responsible for authorizing the use of products including the chemical on their national markets, following a safety evaluation.In France, President Emmanuel Macron had committed to ban glyphosate before 2021 but has since backpedaled. Germany, the EU's biggest economy, plans to stop using it from next year, but the decision could be challenged. Luxembourg’s national ban, for instance, was overturned in court earlier this year.Greenpeace had called on the EU to reject the market reapproval, citing studies indicating that glyphosate may cause cancer and other health problems and could also be toxic to bees. The agroindustry sector, however, claims there are no viable alternatives.“Whatever the final decision that emerges from this re-authorization process, there is one reality that member states will have to face up to,” said Copa-Cogeca, a group representing farmers and agricultural cooperatives. “There is as of yet no equivalent alternative to this herbicide, and without it, many agricultural practices, notably soil conservation, would be rendered complex, leaving farmers with no solutions.”。每一位教师结合自身游戏分享过程中的问题与困惑进行交流，各小组进行梳理，整理共性问题与个性问题，借助教研活动进行研思解惑。                   通过梳理，教研活动针对教师们提出的问题，明确了教研内容与方向，针对游戏分享的内容、关注点、组织方式等开展研讨互动。

B |                                                  – 02 –          理念更新，扎实理论                              《3-6岁儿童学习与发展指南》特别提到“要充分理解和尊重幼儿发展进程中的个别差异，支持和引导他们从原有水平向更高水平发展，按照自身的速度和方式到达《指南》所呈现的发展‘阶梯’，切忌用一把‘尺子’衡量所有幼儿。”观察是基础，只有观察才可以辨别每个幼儿的最近发展区，然后在解读的基础上进行适宜的支持。         通过理论学习，教师们科学理解幼儿的最近发展区，梳理了自主游戏观察评价“五部曲”，即：          观评儿童某个发展点的水平          材料是否丰富          环境氛围是否支持/包容          介入时机          游戏后的回顾（视频/照片）                                                       – 03 –          视频分享，实践研讨          为深入研讨，水映加州幼儿园的教师们观看自主游戏视频，组织各个教师进行幼儿自主游戏观察与幼儿自主游戏评价，共同解读幼儿在游戏现场的行为，讨论自主游戏活动中的亮点、问题、优化建议，分析对本场游戏的优化建议及后续的支持，共同梳理自主游戏的实施要点。         分享交流是游戏活动的重要组成部分，对幼儿语言、思维、交往能力的发展都有着积极的促进作用。通过教研活动的实践，教师不断发现游戏分享中的问题，从而进行调整、优化，在一场场思维碰撞中不断积累经验，提升自身专业素养。

C |                                        编辑 | 张思梦          一审 | 首媛芝          二审 | 首媛芝          三审 |陈扬眉。

D |

Current article:http://www.qiniaohongfangfoguisenzhai.cyou/hde/f3o.doc

Published on:20:40:17