爱情保卫战
土以关系升温或难持久_我的网站
一 |
A US federal judge on Friday temporarily "barred the Pentagon from including Chinese biotechnology group WuXi AppTec on a list of companies believed to support Beijing's military," according to Reuters. Chinese experts said the ruling sends a positive signal for Chinese companies operating in the US, showing that Washington's arbitrary, fact-deficient national security blacklists are not beyond challenge and that firms should make greater use of legal means to defend their legitimate rights.
US District Judge James Boasberg issued an order blocking enforcement of the designation of WuXi in June after the company filed suit. WuXi in a statement welcomed the court's ruling, saying it "relieves us from the immediate adverse consequences" of the Defense Department's designation during the litigation. "We believe that the facts, as demonstrated in our court filings, will prevail after an objective and fair judicial review," a WuXi spokesperson said, according to the report.
A South China Morning Post report noted that the ruling represents an early legal victory for one of China's largest pharmaceutical research and manufacturing service providers and a setback for Washington's expanding use of national-security restrictions against major Chinese commercial companies.
Gao Lingyun, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times that the Pentagon's controversial "list-first, evidence-later" approach has bred massive operational uncertainty for Chinese enterprises conducting legitimate business in the US. By arbitrarily imposing restrictive labels before presenting credible proof, Washington creates an opaque and unpredictable regulatory environment that disrupts normal commercial expectations.
The US Department of Defense released its updated Section 1260H list on June 8, marking the first time WuXi AppTec was formally included, alongside Alibaba, Baidu, BYD and Unitree Robotics, among others.
On June 12, WuXi AppTec announced it had filed suit against the Department of Defense in the US District Court for the District of Columbia. The company said the department's decision was erroneous and lacked factual basis or support under applicable statutes and case law.
He Weiwen, a senior fellow at the Center for China and Globalization, noted that when Chinese companies face unfair and unjustified suppression in the US, they cannot rely solely on corporate statements or diplomatic representations; they must also protect themselves through legal means. Filing suit in federal court is entirely necessary and correct, he said.
"In the past, quite a few Chinese companies had nothing to do with so-called military matters but were hit with US countervailing and anti-dumping measures. Many won their cases after appealing to the Court of International Trade. Legal recourse is an indispensable tool and one we need to take more seriously," he said.
In January 2021, Xiaomi was placed on a similar Pentagon list. The Chinese company later announced on May 26, 2021 that a US court has removed the company's designation as a military-related company and lifted all restrictions on US persons buying or holding its stock, Reuters reported.
The designation has so far had little impact on WuXi AppTec's business. The company reported on August 3 that first-half revenue rose 38.9 percent year-on-year to 28.9 billion yuan, while net profit attributable to shareholders climbed 29.4 percent to 11.08 billion yuan — its first half-year profit above the 10-billion-yuan mark, said media reports.
When asked about US placing several Chinese technology companies including Alibaba, Tencent, BYD, on a list of firms that it says aid China's military, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said that China firmly opposes the US overstretching the concept of national security and formulating various types of discriminatory lists to go after Chinese businesses. "We urge the US to correct its wrongdoings, and stop the unwarranted suppression of Chinese businesses. China will do what is necessary to firmly protect their legitimate and lawful rights and interests," said Lin.
。
9月3日，一艘土耳其护卫舰停靠以色列北部港口城市海法。据悉，这是北约地中海演习计划的一部分，也是自2010年以来土耳其海军舰艇首次停靠以色列港口。
。
二 | 历史上，土耳其曾是以色列在中东地区的重要战略伙伴。1948年，以色列宣布建国后，土耳其是第一个承认以色列的伊斯兰国家。随后，两国建立伙伴关系。
三 | 近年来，因两国在巴勒斯坦、库尔德、东地中海油气开发等问题上存在重大分歧，导致双方关系波折不断。2018年，美国驻以色列大使馆从特拉维夫迁至耶路撒冷，引发巴勒斯坦民众大规模抗议示威，并与以军发生冲突。土耳其随后召回驻以大使，并驱逐以色列大使及驻伊斯坦布尔总领事，土以关系陷入低谷。直至今年6月，随着以色列新政府上台，两国开始加大接触力度。8月17日，以色列总理办公室发表声明，宣布与土耳其恢复外交关系，将重新互派大使和总领事。此次以色列允许土耳其军舰停靠，是两国关系改善的重要举措。土以关系不断升温，符合双方现阶段的利益诉求。对以色列而言，土耳其是中东地区大国和北约成员国，以色列与其保持良好关系，可获得与北约加强合作的契机。以色列国防军在近日发布的一份声明中称，此次允许土方护卫舰停靠海法，是以色列与北约合作的一部分，充分显示了以方对北约的支持。
四 | 此外，在伊核协议谈判取得进展之际，以色列也希望借此拉拢更多国家孤立伊朗。
五 | 同时，以色列是美国的铁杆盟友，与其实现关系正常化可以促进土耳其与美国关系的改善，从而获取更多利益。从未来发展趋势看，虽然在各自利益诉求和发展需要的驱动下，土以两国都在为恢复两国关系努力，但这并不意味着两国关系可以快速升温。两国仍然在多个重要议题、特别是巴勒斯坦问题上存在重大分歧。土耳其外长恰武什奥卢表示，土以互派大使并不意味着土方放弃在巴勒斯坦问题上的立场。此举表明土耳其虽有意愿与以色列重归旧好，但仍将巴以问题视为双边关系的“政治红线”。
六 | 在此情况下，两国关系升温势头能否持久，还有待观察。（作者系国防科技大学国际关系学院副教授 方晓志）
Current article:http://www.qiniaohongfangfoguisenzhai.cyou/glivm7/pjkl.doc
Published on:11:19:53